At sasaftwrites, the website visitor will also find one of my poems, a synopsis of one of my novels, and an excerpt of one of my plays. In addition, I hope to be adding an index of the many topics that I have covered in Mind Check since starting the blog in early 2007.
The Moral Imperative
As the current year draws to a close and a new one looms ahead, this is a good opportunity to revisit the subject of why I am doing the Mind Check blog and in fact why I am motivated to write period. When I first started Mind Check, I said I had a purpose and that that purpose contained within it a moral imperative, namely to make myself better and in so doing to do my small part in making the world a better place.
Specifically I was dealing with the intersection of mind and that external to the mind which I will call “the other”—the other as linked to “I” by that metaphorical bridge we call writing. At the center of this process are the groupings of words with their rules that we call language. The concept that explains words and language is known as communication. Communication is also another way of explaining this intersection of self and other.
Informing Myself What I Think
Okay, so getting down to basics, why am I writing? I write to bring out what I believe for my own benefit and for that of others because I believe that I have something to say that has value to me and to others. And I write because I must, because the need to write is very strong inside me.
Is one of the things I am saying that I do not know my own mind without resorting to the process of writing to bring out the ideas inside my head? That’s exactly what I am saying. My thoughts exist inside my head as fragments, as the incomplete parts of a whole. I need the writing process to objectify those fragments, that is to put them outside of myself to improve my ability to see them or understand them and thereby to aid my mind in filling in the gaps in logic or reasoning and imposing on them a structure.
Pursuit of Fame and Glory
When I was younger I also had another motive for writing, and that was to win myself what I perceived as fame and glory. I believe that such a motive is common among younger writers, and I am pleased that it is not nearly as strong in me as it once was. The pursuit of fame and glory is a good way to add to one’s unhappiness.
Let’s look at the concept of morality and see how it fits in with the topic at hand. The issue of morality must be brought into this discussion because earlier I used the value judgment concept of using writing to make myself better and the world a better place. The key words are “value,” “judgment,” and “better.” All three words raise the probability that a morality is at work in what I am saying.
Code to Measure Against
Morality is a code of behavior or a standard of behavior against which attitudes and behaviors can be measured and having to do with judgments or values, underlying which are the concept of good and evil. That said I have to quickly play devil’s advocate and admit that if writing were inherently a moral act, then what we call hate literature would not exist. As a subset of communication employing language, writing is a way for the self to reach the other. However, we may choose to use writing to exhort the other to hate.
On the other hand, I still believe that by aiding the process of objectification referred to earlier, writing facilitates our being able to see what is moral and what is immoral, what is right and what is wrong more easily. This is why all of the literature acknowledged to be great (admittedly another value judgment) is moral. The fact is morality and aesthetic judgments are inextricably bound together.
Stilted Morals in Literature
The last two statements urgently need clarification. Do I mean that all literature acknowledged to be great has a moral, that is, that it contains a statement of precepts having to do with right and wrong? I do not. In fact, such literature is often quite stilted and is often anything but great.
Do I mean that great literature always presents its subject in a morally positive manner in order to convey its supposed message? If that were the case we would have a very difficult time coming up with a fair assessment of the tragedies of the ancient Greeks—Oedipus Rex and Medea, for example—or the tragedies of Shakespeare such as Hamlet, to cite a small number of examples.
Example of Medea
No, I mean that great literature even when the subject is powerfully negative--a mother who murders her children, as in Medea, for example--derives its power from the presupposition and the foreshadowing of a moral universe in which such behavior is a gross violation.
An exposition of the underpinnings of mortality—the concepts of right and wrong—can only take us so far. Ultimately we must acknowledge the need for a leap beyond reason into a realm where what we know we know before reason or we know before experience, a concept encompassed in the word “apriori.” Whether we are deeply religious or consider ourselves not religious at all, even an atheist, we cannot free ourselves from value systems. They are hard wired into our brains and have everything to do with how we look at the world and how we communicate with others.
Twisting of Values
Yes, but values can be twisted as in the example of hate literature cited earlier. Correct. If this twisting takes place (alert, value system again at work!), the mind is capable of knowing that some defect in reasoning has taken place, although it may not do so. Hence we have people, too many of them, who are steadfast in their hatreds.
The logic behind behaviors and actions deemed to be good is quite compelling, and it is good to remind ourselves of it frequently. However, ultimately the mind has to make a leap and accept the proposition that correct action is good action because it is good because it is the right thing to do. For religious people this is what faith is all about. For them it is a basis, perhaps the most important one for some, for a belief in God.
A very happy new year to you all.
To reach the author of Mind Check, write Stephen.saft@gmail.com. Comprehensive website at http://www.sasaftwrites.com.
Copyright © 2007 by Stephen Alan Saft
No comments:
Post a Comment